UN Climate Report: We need Planet renovation
2.8° under current policies; 2.6° if all national climate action plans are implemented. A laughable 0.2°. Only by reducing CO2 emissions can we limit global warming to 1.5° by 2100.
In search of the oldest article on PEGE.org about planetary enovation: February 2009:
| CO2 carbon dioxid interest
| |
|
Who takes a credit has to pay back because of the interest much more. Also at the greenhouse gases, interest exists, the unfreezing permafrost grounds worsen the situation.
|
| Climate renewal costs
| |
|
The resarch of the earth population about the theme climate renewal and climate renovation costs is complete insufficient. But without caclulation of the consequential costs no CO2 tax.
|
The terms “CO2 credit,” “CO2 interest,” and “credit repayment with interest” clearly mean that CO2 in the atmosphere must be removed. As permafrost thaws, the amount of CO2 that needs to be removed could become significantly greater than the amount emitted; climate restoration is conceptually identical to planetary restoration.
|
"Calculation ERROR" in 2013
|
Pages 248 and 249 of my second book, “Calculation ERROR,” describe the four phases of CO2 reduction. Phase 4b: Technical solutions to filter CO2 from the atmosphere and split it into C and O.
|
The "Net-Zero Emissions and Everything Will Be Fine Again" Fairy Tale
|
For years, I have strongly criticized the “net-zero emissions and everything will be fine again” fairy tale. Some of these so-called climate activists unsubscribed from my newsletter because of this. These people were never interested in climate protection, but only in their “save, restrict, and do without” ideology. Of course, just like in communism, there are those who are equal and those who are more equal: Those who are “more equal” can still spend their vacations on exotic beaches reached by flights lasting many hours. That, of course, was a compelling reason why a street protester couldn’t appear at his trial.
Here are two examples of this:
| The end of net zero emissions and everything will be fine again
| |
|
The Guardian reports that almost no CO2 was absorbed on land in 2023. This makes the net-zero emissions target very dangerous climate change trivialization.
|
| The Inquisition then and Cancel culture today
| |
|
"Net zero emissions and everything will be fine" has long since become as unscientific as "The sun revolves around the earth". But Inquisition sticks to the dogma.
|
The 2026 UNEP report states that the opportunity to limit global warming to 1.5 °C as an immediate goal has now been missed, which means that exceeding this threshold is inevitable.
Key Temperature Forecasts in the Report
- 2.8 °C: Global warming will reach 2.8 °C this century if countries continue their current policies.
- 2.6 °C: Global warming will be limited to 2.6 °C if countries implement all of their current national climate action plans (NDCs).
- 1.5 °C: The long-term or immediate goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, with no or only a slight overshoot, is no longer achievable. The UN emphasizes, however, that this overshoot does not have to be permanent; through
Significant reductions in emissions (nearly 6% per year) and the removal of carbon dioxide can bring global average temperatures back down to 1.5 °C by the end of the century.
|
All the fuss in Paris adds up to 0.2 degrees
|
A laughable 0.2-degree difference between current policy and the full implementation of all national climate action plans. What was so celebrated at the 2015 Paris Climate Conference now amounts to a laughable 0.2-degree difference. Here is my strongest criticism of the Paris Climate Agreement:
| Paris Convention and Trump
| |
|
Newsletter from PEGE.org in 2017-05-28
|
For many, the goals of the PEGE are still unimaginable, but limiting global warming to just 1.5 degrees by 2100 is exactly what that entails.
The first version is available for download. Version 0.2 will be ready around the middle of the week. Here is an excerpt from the manual, chapter “GEMINI Next-Generation House in an Energy-Optimized Residential Area”:
|
Designed to serve as the sole source of energy
|
We believe that photovoltaics will eclipse every other energy source in the coming decades—not just surpass them, but outperform them by orders of magnitude. We believe that combining housing and energy production is best for our future as a whole. Can all the energy our civilization needs be generated right where we live? Not by all of us, but just by the one-third of us who live in energy-optimized communities?
This concept answers that question: Yes, it is possible. Yes, we can discuss any other energy source—hydropower, wind power, biomass energy, nuclear power, and all those tiny niche energy sources. Would this new hydropower plant really be a benefit for us? Do we have to sacrifice forests for more wind power? Isn’t 26,000 km² for biomass energy a senseless waste of valuable land?
Consider the yields and the low level of self-consumption in various regions. Multiply that figure by one billion. That dwarfs total global electricity generation. We need this for global prosperity, recycling, and AI. Restoring the planet to 350 ppm falls under recycling.
Just last week I wrote: If there were more granular subscription tiers—say, the next tier at US$50 per month—I would switch right now. US$100 per month would still be unprofitable at this point.
Since then, it has become clear that the switch to a $100-per-month subscription is inevitable.
- Expansion of Energy Simulation
- Complete design of the GEMINI house, including technical drawings and production files
- Software for the criteria of the building standard Climate Protection Superiority House
Just as there are consumption figures for liters and electricity, there are also consumption figures for AI. These clearly show that programming is hard work.
|
Who are we? Our shareholders
|
Who are we? Our shareholders. I ask all existing shareholders—and, hopefully, many new ones soon—to submit contributions like this.
So far, only 2% of our shareholders have become shareholders themselves by referring new shareholders. That number should increase significantly in the future. The offer is 10% of the purchased shares for a direct referral and 5% for an assist. I understand the term “assist” in the same way as in soccer: whoever passes the ball to the goal scorer has made an assist. |
