Simulating instead of wasting money

We have so much data and computing power today compared to the past. It's so sad that this is completely overlooked by all the slogan shouters. It's decivilization.

There is no discussion whatsoever about the energy transition, just pointless slogans shouted without any expertise. What is the point of decades of technical progress if everything falls into such primitiveness? In 1985, the computing power for extensive simulations was simply lacking. The iconic supercomputer of the time was the Cray-2. 2 tons in weight, 256 MB to 2 GB RAM, several GB of hard disks. 150 kW power consumption. Since a Cray-2 is significantly slower than my notebook, I couldn't even afford the electricity bill for my simulations with a Cray-2. My own equipment at that time was an ATARI-ST with 512 kB RAM. That's 0.0005 GB. A 20 MB hard disk was added a year later, 0.02 GB. A Motorola 68000 worked in it with 8 MHz clock. A file with hourly solar, wind, temperature data from 2005 to 2023 has 7.6 MB. For a simulation I use 5 of these files, different orientations of photovoltaics. The folder about the simulations currently has 3.7 GB. The data procurement, there is the Geographical Photovoltaic Information System. Data that scientists might have dreamed of in their wildest dreams in 1985. It is so sad that this is completely overlooked by all the slogan shouters. It is decivilization, run by people for whom everything is far too complicated and who only know what to do with very simple slogans.

My 2024 simulation

Where can I get investors? There are those rich countries where we can easily afford to import oil. But there are also those countries where all development is stagnating because oil imports are causing a catastrophic trade deficit. I have been observing this since the oil price crisis in 2008. The mentality in these affluent countries is that we can afford the luxury of climate protection, which is simply very expensive. For the poor countries: We need to replace oil with something cheaper, importing oil robs us of any future development. So it's not climate protection as a higher ideal, for which we have to sacrifice a lot, but the struggle for existence with oil imports. Somewhere along a dirt road there is a small settlement, 16 houses, 2 MW PV, but what does the rest of the equipment look like to regularly charge cars and trucks all year round? The specification was fast charging at 20 cents/kWh. Can such a settlement be viable with 20 cents/kWh and a few other activities? That was a completely different way of thinking. The local approach: you have to pay for all this expensive stuff, otherwise you're a climate change denier. Prices like for the devotional objects of a money-obsessed guru who plunders his followers to the hilt. The forced conversion: you have to buy an insanely overpriced heat pump or you'll be punished, the German heating law. See €45,000 for a simple air source heat pump with installation. Why 20 cents/kWh? Because a typical diesel price in Africa in 2024 was €1.20 per liter and 3 kWh of electricity replaces 1 liter of diesel on average and the energy costs for mobility should be halved. This calculation works very precisely for me: 4.35 liters of diesel/100 km in the Dacia Lodgy became 14.2 kWh of electricity/100 km in the Tesla Y. Also fits with diesel truck vs. Tesla Semi. How can you build such an off-grid fast-charging settlement cheaply with the prices expected for 2030? Many trillions of computing operations, for which there was neither data nor computing power in 1985, on a €500 notebook. Various quantities of sodium batteries, iron-air batteries, power to methanol and generators were used in the calculations to find an optimum cost. Simulate instead of wasting money! There were a lot of findings from these simulations. All these findings are briefly summarized in the paper for the CORP.at conference in March 2026. Why power-to-methanol? There is nothing more absurd than a 100 MWh pressurized storage tank for hydrogen somewhere along a runway, which is two orders of magnitude more expensive than a simple tank for methanol. Just yesterday, another discussion with an "expert" that developing countries cannot afford the energy transition because a 1 GW backup power plant costs over a billion. On Alibaba, you can immediately find 200 kW methanol generators for €40,000. Close to the equator, the new construction of a high-voltage grid is also uneconomical. This deprives the 1 GW power plant of any basis for existence.

IPCC cancels disaster scenarios

What was the deleted scenario anyway? What if half of the world's population had the per capita fossil energy consumption of the USA 20 years ago and the other half of the world's population had the per capita fossil energy consumption of the EU? This is how a future without renewable energy was imagined in the fantasy horror novel "The Limits to Growth". Practically a scenario of what would happen if renewable energy were 10 times more expensive. Anyone who refuses to optimize costs is an enemy of climate protection. Anyone who demands overpriced technology is an enemy of climate protection.

Between application and registration

The registration took place 9 days ago on Friday with a lawyer in Budapest. The share capital has been credited to the foundation account. Raiffeisen Bank Budapest sent confirmation of the payment of the share capital to the lawyer on Wednesday. The HUF 105,000 registration fee has been transferred to the Hungarian authorities. Now it's all about improving the capital resources. Next up is the €400,000 for the prototype. Here is our offer to join in

Who are we? Our shareholders

Who are we? Our shareholders." I ask all old and hopefully soon numerous new shareholders for contributions of this kind.

Recruiting new shareholders

So far, only 2% of our shareholders have become shareholders themselves through new shareholder referrals. This should increase significantly in the future. The offer is 10% of the shares purchased for a direct referral and 5% for an assist. I understand the term assist in the same way as in soccer: whoever passes the ball to the scorer has made an assist.