The preservation of a civilization

If you look at the policies of many EU countries, their governments are probably contaminated by the ideas of this destructive cult.

We are going full throttle against the wall, I have to wake up the politicians. That was my motive for starting the Politics subdomain in PEGE.org in 2004. The signs of decay were already so clear to me back then.

I wrote this in 2005, 21 years ago

Human rights in industrialized countries
	No smoking guns to be seen. Slow-acting subtle methods taken for granted by society are more disastrous than some dictatorships.

Human right to work
	No human rights violations? Anyone who denies the serious violations of the human right to work is accusing 5 million Germans of not wanting to work.

Human right to family
	No human rights violations? Then why do so many people give up their families and children? Or the fox for whom the grapes are too sour because they are hanging far too high for him.

Plant closures
	Mr. K leads a modest life. His house is paid off, he gets his firewood from the forest and his family has had a small business for generations. Now he has to close down.

Forced childlessness
	Politicians complain that the higher earners have fewer children on average than the poorer sections of the population. But politics is the cause of this.

Forced savings for 20 years of vacation
	The remaining life expectancy of 65-year-olds in Germany in 2010 will already be 17.1 years for men and 20.8 years for women. A society is falling apart because of the pension system.

Human right to honesty
	A system that forces many people to be dishonest is wrong. A system where many people can only survive because they are dishonest is wrong.

Human right to a future
	A system that acts as if there is no future is wrong. A system that is not able to create a positive future for people is wrong.

Maintaining civilization

The most important criterion here is to have enough children so that there is a population in the future. Numerous animal species have become extinct because they had too few young to maintain the species. One could directly assume that the ultimate goal of the so-called "progressives" is extinction. I wrote about this back in January 2005.

Destructive ideologies reduce the population

Destructive cult prevents functional energy transition
	A horror novel about a world without renewable energy and recycling delayed a workable energy transition and thus effective climate protection by decades.

If you look at the policies of many EU countries, their governments are probably contaminated by the ideas of this destructive cult. The prerequisites for motivating the native population to produce sufficient new blood:

Affordable housing
Trust in institutions such as kindergarten and school
Good and stable long-term prospects
Financial incentives

Current situation in Germany:

Housing shortage
The fear that children will be indoctrinated with insane ideas at school or even convinced of the need for a sex change in a super-GAU.
Long-term planning is not recognizable
Abolition of co-insurance for spouses, the abolition of spousal splitting is being discussed in politics

How does a family that is planning to buy their own home and have children feel when there is a lot of pressure on old people living in their own home to move into a tiny rented apartment? You dream of being visited by children with grandchildren in three decades' time, so you do something to make things better for yourself in the future. You certainly don't pay to replace your own home with a tiny rented apartment later on, where nobody can visit you. Survival means abundance and security, not slipping just past the subsistence level in the face of catastrophe. However, the entire "save, limit, renounce" ideology aims to artificially create situations of scarcity.

The living space and energy demand equation

In 1991, the equation for me was 1,200 TWh/a electricity demand / 80 million inhabitants * 2 inhabitants per house equals 30,000 kWh per year. That was the planning specification for the GEMINI habitable solar power plant. Today, this equation applies to Germany: 10,000 km² of energy-optimized settlement areas with 1,400 GW of photovoltaics results in 1,200 TWh/a of 24 electricity. How much 24x365 electricity this will produce depends on the rest of the electricity mix and any technology that may become available in the future. But 1,200 TWh/a 24 electricity is a solid basis. It's not just about electricity, it's also about affordable, family-friendly living space in large quantities.

5 million HUF share capital is the minimum

17,792 € in the account for the share capital. Ideally, the company should be founded with over €24,000 in share capital. I was in Budapest last week. The first appointment was on Thursday. I have to go again for signatures and to open a bank account. The search for investors for the prototype will only continue after the successful establishment of Zrt (unlisted public limited company in Hungary). Finding €400,000 requires different methods than finding €24,000. The prototype will most likely be realized on the property of Mr. Kamml, which is located directly south of ADEG in Unken. The proximity to Salzburg is a locational advantage for the planned invitation of industrialists and politicians from all over the world. Every small contribution counts towards the rapid realization of the share capital. At the moment, multiples of € 120, a block of 30 shares for the buyer. 40 × € 600 is also € 24,000. Here to the share price development. This far-reaching solution concept must not fail due to the total ignorance of investors in German-speaking countries. Perhaps I would have found an investor in the German-speaking world for "The self-sufficient survival house for the rich, only one million each". That would have fitted in perfectly with the local rip-off mentality. But that's not me. Here is our offer to join in

Who are we? Our shareholders

Who are we? Our shareholders." I ask all old and hopefully soon numerous new shareholders for contributions of this kind.

Recruiting new shareholders

So far, only 2% of our shareholders have become shareholders themselves through new shareholder referrals. This should increase significantly in the future. The offer is 10% of the shares purchased for a direct referral and 5% for an assist. I understand the term assist in the same way as in soccer: whoever passes the ball to the scorer has made an assist.