Linkedin - image of the western culture of decline
Someone has a question about a comment of mine, I can't answer because I'm banned from more than 1 comment per day: “Oh, just escaped from the discussion”.
In October 2025, I was at Slush Heilbronn, a meeting of start-ups and investors. Someone strongly advised me to be present on LinkedIn. When I wanted to follow this recommendation, I realized that I had already created a LinkedIn profile around 2010. I had completely forgotten about it.
LinkedIn is designed to be the spitting image of Western doom culture.
|
The veto right of the outraged minority
|
No matter how many positive reactions there are to a comment, the outraged minority has a veto right. This means that you can only post one comment per day for a few days. The second comment will then appear:
In 2026, I was able to post more than one comment per day on January 01, 02, 10, 11, 22, 23, 24 and February 10, 11, 23, 24, 25. That's 12 out of 59 days, or 80% of the days I was limited to one comment per day.
Of course, this is also deliberate damage to my reputation. Someone has a question about one of my comments and I can't answer. The other person, to whose question I can't answer, responds: "Oh, just escaped from the discussion like that".
A recurring element: restrictions are presented as a technical problem.
You will receive notifications:
But when you click on the notification, this is all you see:
Censorship is presented as a technical malfunction.
These are the ways to react to a posting. Everything must be positive. There is simply no such thing as anger or astonishment.
The word liar probably triggered this censorship warning. Sure, all those pseudo climate protectors who write "Climate protection is my vocation" in their profile are not liars and are therefore, by implication, honest people. So I had to replace a letter with _.
Special features of a platform lead to special behavior. When Elon Musk hadn't yet taken over Twitter, I was constantly getting emails with "New message about Roland Mösl". There were a lot of radical left-wing Twitter accounts back then that hunted down dissenters and then proudly posted, we managed to get this account blocked. My countermeasure: Red Block, a Google Chrome browser extension. Identify who is causing trouble. If I then found one of these "Hooray, we've managed to get another account blocked", I blocked it with all followers at once, 500 blocks per day was the maximum.
It was a successful campaign. The e-mails "New message about Roland Mösl" no longer came every few days, but only every 5 to 6 weeks, because I must have blocked 95% of the reporters.
There are remarkably many posts about hydrogen cars on Linkedin. This is due to the veto power of the outraged minority. The hydrogen car fans can use it to paralyze critics. You practically never find such nonsense on X, because a violent reaction sets in immediately.
|
News on the PEM electrolysis nonsense
|
as Ingenieur.de reports on PEM electrolysis.
Is this a reference to the catastrophic shortage of raw materials for iridium, the high prices? No, far from it, it's just about an eternal chemical in the foil.
Further proof that these people do not take the energy transition and climate protection seriously. If you take the issue seriously, the first question with any technology is the availability of raw materials for global use.
|
The planetary restoration mentality
|
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means about 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
|
GEMINI next Generation AG will prove the contrary
|
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 100 times or 1000 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal?
Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that they have no solution that is even remotely viable.
On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy.
It's about survival! The social situation in 2025 compared to 2005, extrapolated to 2045, makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements.
One new shareholder said "Me with my very modest investment", but €400 times €1,000 is also €400,000 for all investments up to the creation of the prototype.
There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program.
Here are the details. |
