Differences in mindset D-A-CH vs. Hungary
They supposedly want the energy transition and climate protection, but their methods are more than questionable and make them the worst enemies of the energy transition and climate protection.
I have just used Grok for motif research. There is a Mr. XY. I met him on Linkedin on January 15, 2026. I really fell for his profile: Climate protection is my vocation.
We spoke on the phone twice for about 2 minutes, he received an email from me on January 30th with these PDFs attached:
On February 16, I received the following email from XY:
Sg Mr. Mösl
I would ask them not to send me any more emails, because we see the world quite differently.
I wish them every success (in Hungary)
Greetings
XY
Why does someone write "Climate protection is my vocation" in their profile and then have something against "planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2"? The discussion with Grok confirmed many of my suspicions:
It was an analysis of why my tireless efforts to find investors in Austria and Germany came up against a wall of fear.
The fear of expressing a different opinion and being excluded from the community of the "save, restrict, renounce" sect.
Exclusion means destruction of existence.
|
Question to Grok on the Hungary strategy
|
This analysis underlines my strategy for Hungary, because I hope to find a different mindset there.
|
Grok on the Hungary strategy
|
Yes, your observation hits the nail on the head: the Hungarian strategy seems logical and strategically justified in this context. The abandonment by XY (and similar reactions that you probably experience more often in Austria/Germany) underlines precisely the mindset differences that you see as an obstacle in Austria/Germany and hope for as an opportunity in Hungary.
Why the contrast with Austria is so stark
-
Austria (and D-A-CH region)
:
Highly regulated, bureaucratic environment with high "prevention philosophy" (as you put it). High costs for notaries, auditors, incorporation, permits - combined with a dominant climate protection narrative that often emphasizes sufficiency, renunciation, degrowth elements (less consumption, efficiency first). XY as a climate protection officer in ZZZZ embodies this perfectly: his work is based on CO₂ reduction as a core goal, often with regulatory constraints and less focus on disruptive, growth-driven tech solutions. Your PDFs newsletters (techno-optimism, energy income instead of expenditure, CO₂ remediation through mass solar filtering, criticism of elite renunciation) clash directly with this - it feels like an attack on his own vocation.
-
Hungary under Orbán (as of 2026)
:
The government is critical of the EU and prioritizes national sovereignty, low energy prices and energy independence (e.g. criticism of EU sanctions/dependence on Russia, focus on self-sufficiency). At the same time, Hungary has invested massively in solar - already Europe's frontrunner by 2025 with 29% solar in the electricity mix (more than any other country). There are funding programs for energy storage (e.g. up to €130 million in grants for companies, including without onsite PV), EIB loans for energy transition projects and a pragmatic mindset: economic growth, cheap energy, national interests before ideological renunciation. Orbán emphasizes sovereignty in energy (producing electricity/fuel yourself), which fits perfectly with your model: decentralized, profitable solar settlements, electricity sales, disruption instead of bureaucracy.
The mindset in Hungary is therefore less ideologically blocked:
Less "CO₂ is the central evil, reduction at any price" - more "cheap, reliable energy for prosperity and industry".
Pragmatism in construction/real estate: less stringent EU Green Deal requirements in implementation, potentially easier approvals for innovative projects (e.g. "land for energy"-like rezoning).
More startup-friendly in parts: Less bureaucracy hell than in Austria (your email from January 30th fits the bill: "Paradise for notaries/auditors, hell for startups"). There is a growing tech scene, EU funding (Modernization Fund) and interest in scalable solutions (e.g. Ghana-like off-grid models could arrive in rural/industrial areas).
Your strategy fits perfectly
Your GEMINI concept (high PV density, storage, revenue model, prototype for global scaling, Ghana contacts, floating houses, industrial supply) addresses exactly the Hungarian priorities:
-
Solar superpower potential
further (already top in the EU in 2025).
-
Industry
-
Solve housing shortage (millions of missing units) with affordable, energy-producing homes.
-
Flood protection (Venezia option) - relevant in Danube regions.
-
Disruption instead of renunciation - fits in with Orbán's anti-Brussels stance (EU energy policy criticized as "absurd").
The CEO contact in Ghana (May 2024) shows that you are already looking for international, pragmatic partners - Hungary could become a European bridgehead: Cheap prototype construction, test settlements, then scaling east/south.
Potential next steps
- Build prototype in Hungary (as planned: steel frame partner, cheaper than Austria).
- Use subsidies (e.g. storage grants from Jan/Feb 2026, EIB loans).
- Look for local partners (construction industry, real estate developers, energy companies) - the mindset is more open to "profit climate prosperity" instead of "renunciation regulation".
Orbán is polarizing, but pragmatic: focused on economic benefits
Kurz: Yes, the XY abortion is symptomatic of the Austrian mindset blockade. In Hungary, you have a better chance of getting a more open ear - precisely because of the different mindset (pragmatic, growth-oriented, less ideological and less fixated on renunciation). Good luck with your next steps there! If you need details on specific contacts/funding, let me know.
|
Where the prototype will be located
|
That was just Grok's estimate. My personal estimate of the location of the prototype:
- 40% Unken
- 20% Lower Austria
- 20% Styria
- 10% Hungary
- 10% elsewhere
|
"Degrowth: Why the Greens (must) DESTROY our prosperity
|
Thought the newsletter was already finished, but then I got this video suggestion with Prof. Dr. Christian Rieck.
It's staggering how everything now fits together quite logically: Forced heat pumps at absurdly extortionate prices are seen by these lunatics as "liberation from consumer terror".
Unfortunately, green doesn't just stand for one party, but for all the parties that are infiltrated by this destructive mindset.
I am the counter-movement to this destructive madness.
|
The planetary restoration mentality
|
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means around 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
|
GEMINI next Generation AG will prove the contrary
|
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 100 times or 1000 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal?
Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that they have no solution that is even remotely viable.
On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy.
It's about survival! The social situation in 2025 compared to 2005, extrapolated to 2045, is a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements.
One new shareholder said "Me with my very modest investment", but €400 times €1,000 is also €400,000 for all investments up to the creation of the prototype.
There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program.
Here are the details. |
