Donald Trump - CO2 - and degenerate elites

The logic Donald Trump uses to claim that CO2 is harmless and the behavior of a degenerate elite that has contributed to this conclusion.

Who believes in a climate catastrophe and that it can be averted, must be averted? Who believes that innovation and cost optimization can avert a climate catastrophe? Me and some readers of my newsletter, a tiny minority in the West. How many thousands of times have I posted about this, how many events have I attended about the energy transition and climate protection? No reaction or even negative reactions mean they don't really care, it's all just lip service and PR posturing. My impression: they want to use the climate catastrophe argument to rip us off, cost optimization, no, we could rip them off less. My conclusion: I have to look for investors for the GEMINI next generation house elsewhere because the so-called climate protectors and energy transition fans hate me. Donald Trump's conclusion from this: the climate protectors only see this as a business model, so I assume that CO2 is actually harmless.

The battle cry of German energy transition fans

We want to be paid for electricity, even if we can't feed it into the grid! There is the German Economics Minister Reiche, who wants to bring some common sense into the system, there is the unbelievable agitation of the energy transition fans without any expertise. The motto:

We are the good guys, we have to waste your money to do good!
We want money for worthless surplus electricity at lunchtime!
We want you to build an enormous number of power lines to transport away worthless surplus electricity!

This means that worthless surplus electricity will be a double burden on electricity consumers:

EEG levy is paid by the taxpayer. The difference between the EEG remuneration and the spot market price.
High grid fees due to enormous unnecessary grid expansion

The right way would be to manage with a much smaller grid connection and to convert the worthless surplus electricity into peak power using batteries. This also saves a lot of natural gas; the price peak on the spot market at sunset is very pronounced because the rapid load change at peak load power plants occurs with poor efficiency.

Photovoltaics and the grid connection

Large photovoltaic systems in Germany are typically connected at 100% of peak power. This is economic madness caused by lobby groups with the battle cry "We have to do this, whatever the cost!". But what is really necessary? When the new electricity law in Austria had not yet been passed, I simulated the consequences of wild rumors about this new law. I therefore simulated how much loss would occur with a very small grid connection. 53 kWp photovoltaics and 17 kW grid connection are fully compatible with a 140 kWh battery. I even simulated down to 11 kW. Question for Grok: Grid expansion costs and photovoltaics. Let's assume a hypothetical regulation, the grid connection is limited to 30% of the photovoltaic peak power. My simulations show that with 3 kWh battery per kWp, almost all the electricity can still be fed into the grid. To what extent would this reduce grid expansion costs in Germany? Whenever it comes to the German energy transition, Grok gives strange answers such as H2-ready. There is just so much nonsense in circulation. Of course I can draw Grok's attention to this mistake and get him to see reason. For example, where should the hydrogen be stored if only 1⁄3 of the energy fits into the 25 km³ underground storage facility with hydrogen? This is just an initial estimate and the cost savings are dramatic.

Cost optimization - the key to the energy transition and climate protection

This is the title of my presentation at the CORP conference in March. Anyone who rejects cost optimization in the area of the energy transition as vehemently as the energy transition fans is, for me, just as bad a climate change denier as Donald Trump. Every movement is as credible as it presents itself to the public. The energy transition fans have caused immeasurable damage to the energy transition and climate protection through their enormous misconduct.

Fatal degeneration of elites

Question for Grok: Examples from history of how an elite degenerated and became a burden.

Conclusion: The same pattern was followed in all cases:

Success → Wealth/privileges
Loss of responsibility and virtues (spirit of war, thriftiness, willingness to reform)
Isolation and egoism
Burden on society → revolution, anarchy or conquest.

Historians such as Vilfredo Pareto ("Circulation of Elites") or Oswald Spengler described this as a typical cycle: elites must renew themselves through performance, otherwise they become parasitic and fall. These examples show that "degeneration" was not only moral, but above all structural and functional - a lack of adaptation to new challenges. Question for Grok: Are there signs of elite degeneration in the German energy transition? The answer can be found in the link above and has shocked me to the core. I am not dealing with stupid ideologues and dogmatists, but with a degenerate elite that is fighting for its sovereignty of interpretation and sinecures.

The planetary restoration mentality

Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means around 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.

GEMINI next Generation AG will prove the contrary

It's not about whether the shares will be worth 100 times or 1000 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that there is no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2025 compared to 2005, extrapolated to 2045, makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. One new shareholder said "Me with my very modest investment", but €400 times €1,000 is also €400,000 for all investments up to the creation of the prototype. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.

GEMINI shares: time to buy - milestones

The situation has changed fundamentally since this company visited Slovakia. Necessary investment volume reduced by around 90%. Time to marketable product shortened by around one year. The 90% reduction in investment volume also means that each shareholder has significantly more shares. The share price is now lifted towards our targets at each milestone. These milestones can happen in all areas: Financial, new shareholders, new opportunities to attract new shareholders. Contracts to build the prototype, more houses and settlements. Cooperations for realization. Purchase, arrival and testing of important technical components.